/Monitoring, Reporting & Delivery: The Metrics of Success

Monitoring, Reporting & Delivery: The Metrics of Success

Drive projects to successful closure. Demystify Earned Value Management formulas, master RAG status reporting, and conduct effective retrospectives for continuous improvement.

The Short Answer

Monitoring answers: 'We spent 50% of the budget—have we completed 50% of the work?' Earned Value Management (EVM) integrates scope, schedule, and cost into unified metrics. CPI (Cost Performance Index) and SPI (Schedule Performance Index) below 1.0 indicate overrun. For stakeholders, use RAG reports (Red/Amber/Green) to communicate confidence at a glance. Project closure includes formal handoff, retrospective ('What went well? What went wrong?'), and celebration—critical for morale in remote teams.

A project isn't complete when the deliverable ships—it's complete when the organization has learned from the experience.

Earned Value Management (EVM)

EVM is the gold standard for project tracking because it integrates Scope, Schedule, and Cost into a unified system. It answers the critical question others can't.

Core Concepts

Planned Value (PV)

Budget × % Planned Complete

The budgeted cost for work scheduled to be completed by a specific date. The 'Plan.'

Actual Cost (AC)

Sum of actual expenditures

The total cost actually incurred for work executed. The 'Spend.'

Earned Value (EV)

Budget × % Actually Complete

The budgeted value of work actually completed. The 'Value.'

Performance Indices

MetricFormulaInterpretationExample
Cost Performance Index (CPI)CPI = EV / AC< 1.0 = Over budget (spending more than earning) | > 1.0 = Under budgetCPI of 0.8 means for every $1.00 spent, only $0.80 of value is generated.
Schedule Performance Index (SPI)SPI = EV / PV< 1.0 = Behind schedule | > 1.0 = Ahead of scheduleSPI of 0.9 means the project is only 90% as far as planned.
Estimate at Completion (EAC)EAC = BAC / CPIProjected total cost if current performance continuesIf BAC is $100k and CPI is 0.8, EAC = $125k—expect 25% overrun.

Variance Analysis

Cost Variance (CV)

CV = EV - AC

Negative = Over budget | Positive = Under budget

Schedule Variance (SV)

SV = EV - PV

Negative = Behind schedule | Positive = Ahead

Visualizing Progress

Burndown Charts

Track work remaining vs. time. Excellent for team motivation ('burn down to zero').

Limitation: Doesn't distinguish between work completed and scope added. If the line flattens, unclear if team stopped or scope grew.

Burnup Charts

Track work completed (climbing line) against total scope (ceiling line).

Advantage: Explicitly shows scope creep. If the ceiling jumps up, stakeholders see the finish date moved because of added work, not slow delivery.

RAG Status Reporting

Stakeholders need confidence signals, not data tables. RAG provides visual shorthand.

Red

Critical issues threaten project success

Immediate sponsor intervention required

Amber

Off-track or at risk, but recovery plan exists

Monitoring required; PM has a mitigation plan

Green

Proceeding according to plan

Continue; no escalation needed

Best Practices

  • Define thresholds objectively: 'Amber = Budget variance 5-10%'
  • Red is not failure—it's a call for help. Communicate early.
  • Avoid 'Watermelon Reporting' (Green outside, Red inside). It destroys trust.
  • Create a culture of psychological safety where honest status is rewarded.

Project Closure & Continuous Improvement

The Retrospective (Post-Mortem)

The vehicle for continuous improvement. Must be 'Blameless'—focus on systemic process failures, not individual errors.

Retrospective Agenda

  1. 1Recap: What was the original goal?
  2. 2What went well? (Celebrate success)
  3. 3What went wrong? (Identify bottlenecks)
  4. 4Root Cause Analysis: Use '5 Whys' to dig deeper
  5. 5Action Items: Assign owners to fix processes for next time

Closure Checklist

Administrative

  • Close contracts
  • Pay vendors
  • Archive documentation
  • Finalize budget

Technical

  • Revoke access
  • Transfer knowledge
  • Update templates

Cultural

  • Celebrate the team
  • Recognize contributors
  • Share learnings

In remote teams, the 'end' can feel anticlimactic. Deliberate virtual celebrations are vital for morale and psychological closure.

Key Takeaways

  • EVM integrates scope, schedule, and cost. CPI/SPI below 1.0 = problems; EAC forecasts final cost.
  • Burnup charts are superior to Burndown for showing scope creep impact to stakeholders.
  • RAG reports communicate confidence: Green (on track), Amber (recovering), Red (needs help).
  • Define RAG thresholds objectively. Honest reporting requires psychological safety.
  • The retrospective is where learning happens. Make it blameless; focus on systems, not people.
  • Formal closure includes administrative (contracts), technical (access), and cultural (celebration) tasks.
Try Edworking Background

A new way to work from anywhere, for everyone for Free!

Get Started Now