Download Mobile App
SMART is a set of criteria for writing a clear goal. OKRs organise an objective and the measurable key results that show progress towards it. Use SMART to make a goal precise; use OKRs when a shared objective needs several outcome measures and coordinated work. You can use SMART criteria within an OKR.
Neither method guarantees results, and neither is restricted to a company size. Choose the amount of structure your team needs, agree how success will be measured, and keep the work that supports the goal visible.
Below, compare the methods using the same customer-onboarding scenario, then decide how to review progress without confusing completed tasks with achieved outcomes.
Understanding goal-setting frameworks in business
What are goal-setting frameworks?
A goal-setting method helps a team describe a desired outcome and review progress. Some methods, including OKRs, also organise relationships between objectives and results. SMART provides criteria for the goal statement; it does not by itself define company strategy, ownership or a review process.
Goal-setting frameworks are designed to create clarity. They break down lofty ideas into manageable chunks, give direction to daily work, and set a baseline for performance. Think of them as the bridge between a company’s mission and the actual tasks completed by its people.
Why businesses need structured goal-setting
It’s easy to underestimate the power of structure when setting goals. But the truth is, without a solid framework, goals can quickly become confusing, unmeasurable, or worse—irrelevant. Structured goal-setting helps eliminate ambiguity, boosts motivation, and ensures accountability at every level.
Real-world consequences of vague goals vs. structured objectives
Imagine a sales manager telling their team, “Let’s try to sell more this quarter.” Compare that to: “Increase monthly subscription revenue by 15% by the end of Q2 through upselling existing customers.” The second goal is focused, measurable, and trackable—exactly what good frameworks aim to achieve.
Here are some of the most important benefits of using a goal-setting framework in your business:
- Provides crystal-clear direction and purpose
- Aligns team efforts with company priorities
- Encourages measurable outcomes and accountability
- Boosts employee engagement by clarifying expectations
- Supports strategic planning and performance reviews
It’s not just about what you want to achieve—it’s about how clearly you define that path and how well your team can follow it.
SMART goals: specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, time-bound
Breakdown of the SMART acronym
SMART is a widely used checklist for making a goal specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and time-bound. The letters have variants; agree on the meaning your team uses.
Let’s break down what each letter stands for:
- Specific – Name the outcome and the people or process it concerns. “Improve onboarding” is vague; “increase the proportion of new accounts that complete onboarding” identifies what to measure.
- Measurable – If you can’t measure it, how will you know you’ve achieved it? Metrics provide checkpoints and motivation.
- Achievable – Ambition is great, but goals also need to be realistic. Overstretching can lead to burnout and disappointment.
- Relevant – Goals should align with broader company objectives. This avoids busywork and focuses energy where it matters most.
- Time-bound – Deadlines drive urgency and help prevent procrastination. Without one, goals risk floating indefinitely.
When to use SMART goals in business
Use SMART criteria when a goal needs a clearer outcome, measure and deadline. They can apply to a team or an individual, to operational work or to a strategic priority.
Examples for project management, employee performance, and task planning
- For project teams: “By the end of the next quarter, reduce median manual onboarding work from 50 to 30 minutes per account, measured across all accounts completed that quarter.” These numbers are illustrative; confirm a real baseline before committing.
- For employee development: “By the end of the quarter, complete three coaching sessions and demonstrate the agreed feedback technique in two observed practice sessions.” Agree what a successful demonstration looks like.
- For marketing: “By quarter end, increase qualified newsletter signups from 100 to 130 per month, using the same qualification rule and excluding test accounts.” This is an example, not a forecast.
A SMART goal can still be ambitious. Achievable means the team has considered evidence and constraints; it does not mean choosing only a target that is easy to reach.
OKRs: objectives and key results
What makes OKRs powerful
An OKR pairs an Objective, which states the desired direction, with Key Results that make progress assessable. Initiatives are the actions you try in order to influence those results.
Distinguish committed OKRs from aspirational OKRs before the cycle starts. Committed targets are intended to be met; aspirational targets deliberately stretch beyond the expected result. Agree the interpretation in advance rather than calling every missed target a success.
OKRs work best when:
- You want to encourage growth over perfection
- Your team thrives on measurable progress
- You’re aligning efforts across multiple departments
They’re also designed to be transparent. Everyone in the organization can see each other’s OKRs, which fosters alignment and a sense of shared purpose.
When OKRs outperform other frameworks
One of the biggest advantages of OKRs is their flexibility. They’re not tied to specific tasks but instead focus on outcomes. This makes them perfect for fast-moving teams that need to adapt quickly without losing sight of their goals.
Illustrative OKR examples: outcomes and initiatives
- Objective: Make onboarding easier for new customers. Example deadline: the end of the next quarter.
- Key Result 1: Increase onboarding completion within seven days from 60% to 75% of eligible new accounts.
- Key Result 2: Reduce median time to first useful action from five days to three days among accounts that reach that action; report the proportion that never reaches it alongside the median.
- Key Result 3: Reduce onboarding-related support requests from 20 to 12 per 100 eligible new accounts, without reducing access to support. Fix the event definitions, cohort and reporting period before starting.
- Initiatives: interview customers who did not complete onboarding, test a clearer setup checklist, and improve the relevant help article. Completing these activities does not itself prove that onboarding improved.
- Measurement record: name the goal owner, the analytics source, the baseline period, the eligibility rule, the target and the review date. Wait until every account in a seven-day completion cohort has had its full observation window.
- In this example, 60 completions from 100 eligible accounts is 60%; 75 from 100 is 75%. That is an increase of 15 percentage points, not 15%. Keep test accounts and eligibility rules consistent between periods.
- These are invented planning numbers, not Edworking usage results. Check whether the measures are available and trustworthy before adopting the example.
An OKR is useful when the objective needs several measures that would otherwise be tracked separately. Avoid adding key results just to reach a fixed count.
The main difference between OKRs and SMART Goals
Comparing structure, flexibility, and impact
The key distinction is structure: SMART checks the quality of a goal statement; an OKR connects an objective to evidence of progress. Either can include a deadline, an ambitious target and regular review.
For one clearly defined outcome, a SMART statement may be enough. For a shared objective with several dimensions of success, an OKR can make the relationship between the measures easier to discuss.
There is no universal “70% means success” rule. Some aspirational OKR systems use partial attainment as a learning signal; a committed target has a different expectation. What Matters explains committed and aspirational OKRs.
Compare them without false either/or rules: SMART supplies wording criteria; OKRs supply an objective/results structure. Both can track partial progress. Both need an agreed deadline and review cadence. The team must decide whether a target is a commitment or an aspiration.
Which framework is better for your business?
Choose by the problem you need to solve, then use the lightest method that resolves it. Company age and headcount do not decide whether a goal needs clarity or cross-team coordination.
Key questions to help you choose
- Is the goal too vague to know whether it was achieved? Start with SMART criteria.
- Do several teams need to coordinate around one outcome with multiple measures? Consider an OKR.
- Are you missing a baseline, data source or accountable owner? Resolve that before scoring progress.
- Is the work already clear and small enough for an owned task or milestone? Do not add a separate goal system unless it helps a decision.
Set a review rhythm that fits the work. Quarterly OKR cycles are common, but the acronym does not make an annual SMART goal or a monthly review mandatory.
Some companies even blend the two—using SMART criteria to shape their Key Results within the OKR framework. There’s no rule that says you can’t have the best of both worlds.
Common mistakes to avoid with goal-setting frameworks
When businesses adopt goal-setting frameworks, they often expect immediate results. But just choosing a method—whether OKRs or SMART Goals—won’t guarantee success. The way you implement and manage these frameworks matters just as much as the framework itself.
One common misstep is misalignment. Teams sometimes set goals that look good on paper but don’t tie back to broader business objectives. For instance, a marketing team might set a SMART Goal to increase newsletter sign-ups without realizing the product team is focused on a different customer segment entirely. When goals aren’t connected across departments, progress in one area can unintentionally create friction elsewhere.
Another trap is over-complicating things. It's easy to get carried away with metrics, creating dozens of key results or highly detailed SMART statements. But if goals feel too rigid or require endless tracking, teams can become overwhelmed or disengaged. On the flip side, under-committing—setting goals that are too easy—can be just as problematic. Teams might hit their targets without actually moving the needle in a meaningful way.
The best outcomes usually come when you find the sweet spot: goals that are challenging but realistic, structured but not suffocating, and ambitious without being unrealistic. That balance creates momentum and builds a culture of accountability without crushing creativity or flexibility.
How Edworking supports goal-setting frameworks
Goal execution made easy with Edworking
Implementing OKRs or SMART Goals is one thing—tracking and managing them effectively is another. That’s where Edworking really shines. Designed with flexibility in mind, it’s a go-to platform for teams that need to turn strategy into action. Whether you’re leading a startup, managing a remote team, or juggling multiple clients, Edworking helps break down big objectives into small, manageable steps.
Use Edworking Tasks for the initiatives that support a goal. Add an owner, due date and completion criteria, and link the goal record. Keep measured business outcomes in that record rather than treating the number of completed cards as an OKR score.
Keep the measurement record connected to the work
Goals mean little without communication, and Edworking keeps teams connected through built-in chat and video conferencing. These features let you jump into discussions about key results or upcoming deadlines without switching between apps. It’s all in one place, which keeps the entire workflow smooth and distraction-free.
Maintain the objective, baseline, target and latest evidence in a shared document. Review the figures with the owner and record why an initiative changes. This is a manual goal-review workflow, not a claim that Edworking calculates or validates OKR outcomes automatically.
Conclusion
Setting goals is easy. Setting the right goals—and actually achieving them—that’s the real challenge. Whether you lean toward OKRs for their ambition and alignment or prefer the clarity and structure of SMART Goals, what matters most is consistency. The framework is just the starting point. Success comes from revisiting your goals, adjusting them when needed, and making sure your entire team understands and believes in them.
You don’t have to pick a side. Some companies thrive by blending both approaches—using SMART for personal or team-level goals and OKRs to drive company-wide focus. The key is to make goal-setting a habit, not a quarterly checkbox.
Start small. Test one framework on your next project. Track the results, talk about what worked, and keep iterating. The more intentional you are with your goals, the more momentum you’ll build—and the easier it becomes to scale, innovate, and succeed.
OKRs vs SMART Goals: quick decision guide (with Edworking setup)
For the onboarding example above, the corresponding SMART goal is: “By the end of the next quarter, increase seven-day onboarding completion from 60% to 75% of eligible new accounts, using a fixed eligibility rule and the same analytics source.” The OKR adds other outcome measures when the objective needs them.
- Use SMART goals when you need clear, time-bound outcomes and predictable delivery milestones.
- Use OKRs when you want measurable outcomes with room for learning and alignment across teams.
- Keep initiatives as assigned tasks and results as measured outcomes. In the first review, confirm the data definition before discussing the score.
- Review progress regularly and record what changed, using team chat context to keep decisions connected to goals.
- Close each cycle by capturing results and converting lessons into the next set of objectives.
Want to run goals and execution in one place? Start with pricing and your first workspace.
