A practical buying guide
Edworking vs Trello
A familiar board or a fuller team workspace?
A small team that is happy on Trello Free may have no subscription savings to gain. Evaluate the friction around each card rather than replacing a working board just to consolidate tools.


Edworking & Trello
Edworking vs Trello: how do the features compare?
Product capabilities across available plans and paid upgrades. ✓ Available; × not built in. Integrations alone do not count. Notes identify connected first-party apps. Plan limits and AI allowances vary; the cost example below compares entry plans.
Features and limits | Edworking | Trello |
|---|---|---|
Published flat-price unlimited-user team plan | Available | Not built in Published plans charge per seat or host; enterprise terms may differ |
Task assignments and due dates | Available | Available |
List and board views | Available | Available |
Rich-text documents | Available | Not built in |
Dedicated team chat channels | Available | Not built in |
Built-in video meetings | Available | Not built in |
Screen sharing in calls | Available | Not built in |
File sharing and attachments | Available | Available |
AI writing and summaries | Available | Available |
AI assistant for work questions | Available | Not built in AI card tools, not a conversational workspace assistant |
AI task and workflow actions | Available | Available AI card creation and organization |
iOS and Android apps | Available | Available |
External collaborators | Available | Available |
Workspace search and filters | Available | Available |
Comments and mentions | Available | Available |
Built-in time tracking | Available | Not built in Available through a separate time-tracking tool |
Managed sprint cycles | Available | Not built in Boards and templates can model sprints; no dedicated sprint-cycle feature |
Record async video updates | Available | Not built in |
Reviewed:
All your apps, your AI, and your team in Edworking
Six products that replace your whole stack, and the hundred small things around them.
From the brief to the finished work
Move beyond cards with project documents, built-in calls and time tracking in the same workspace. Keep the visual board your team understands while adding the context around each task.
Keep the brief close
Write the project brief in Docs, attach the files and assign the first task.
Make decisions together
Discuss the task in chat or a call, then record what was agreed.
Turn the decision into progress
Confirm the owner and due date, update the task and keep the team informed.
Cost example
Lowest paid plan · annual billing · USD

Edworking · Basic
1 person
$5.00monthly equivalent
$60.00 per year
50 people
$40.83monthly equivalent
$490.00 per year
Flat team pricing
Core features and AI
- Tasks✓
- Collaborative documents✓
- Team messaging✓
- Video meetings✓
- File sharing✓
- AI features✓
400 AI calls/month

Trello · Standard
1 person
$5.00monthly equivalent
$60.00 per year
50 people
$250.00monthly equivalent
$3,000.00 per year
Core features and AI
- Tasks✓
- Collaborative documents×
- Team messaging×
- Video meetings×
- File sharing✓
- AI features✓
Trello AI · Included AI with usage limits
Taxes, discounts, AI add-ons and services are excluded. Seat minimums and billing rules can change the invoice.
Migration plan: Trello → Edworking
Start with one project. Create your workspace, upload a supported export and invite your team.
Customer experience
These customers explicitly mention Trello. Their dated experiences describe their own use, not a current feature test or a guaranteed result.
“A value-for-money, reliable tool that works effectively and can adequately replace trello or any other job board. It delivers strong performance without the high costs of traditional job platforms. I really like the standalone apps compared to the browser version—they help me focus better on work. The ticket system is well designed and very effective.”Georgios S. ·
Read the original review →“I bought this for its features that solve my problems. This to me is the Thinking Man's Trello, with bells and whistles. It works really well for me and I can organise my separate gigs into logical order. I have Blue and Suitedash, but this just makes sense for my needs and team size.”fran49 ·
Read the original review →Compare Edworking with Other Platforms
See how Edworking stacks up against leading collaboration tools
Asana
Portfolio coordination or everyday team delivery?
Start with one real handoff: who owns the task, where the brief lives and how progress reaches the project lead. Then test the reporting your managers require; a simpler daily workflow is not a substitute for necessary portfolio controls.
ClickUp
Flexible project management or a more focused team workspace?
ClickUp already combines tasks, Docs and Chat. Its depth can be useful; the question is how much of that configuration your team needs. Pilot the same live project in both products before deciding.
Basecamp
Two connected workspaces with different working styles
Both products consolidate several collaboration tools, and Basecamp also offers flat-rate packages. Compare the active-project and storage limits you need instead of assuming a per-user price advantage.
Ready to work better, together?
Start free with up to 5 users. Upgrade for unlimited users on a flat team price, everything connected by AI.
Frequently asked questions
Choose Edworking for straightforward onboarding, flat team pricing and tasks, docs, chat, meetings, files and AI in one place. Choose Trello when a visual board and its existing Power-Ups already cover your workflow.
Not necessarily. Compare paid licenses, required tiers, add-ons and retained tools. Include migration effort and test the free options before estimating savings.
CSV (native export requires Trello Premium or Enterprise): Cards, boards, lists, labels, members and due dates. Not imported: Power-Ups, automations, checklists, card comments and attachments. The assistant shows the export steps for the source you pick. Attachments only travel with ClickUp exports, unmatched assignees arrive unassigned, and your data in the original tool is never touched. Import into an empty space so a second run cannot merge into existing work.